Neonatal renal replacement therapy: An ethical reflection for a crucial decision.

CONTEXT: Technological advances in fetal and neonatal medicine, recent changes in the French legal framework, and encouraging results of the long-term outcomes in children with neonatal renal failure provide elements for an ethical reflection. METHODS: We led a nationwide enquiry among French pediatric nephrologists, intensivists, and neonatologists, exploring the decision-making process when contemplating starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) or delivering palliative care to neonates or infants with pre-end-stage or end-stage renal disease; and the ethical quandaries at hand in such scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 134 responses with complete national coverage were obtained. Care to be delivered to an infant in pre-end-stage or end-stage renal disease did not achieve consensus. Pediatric nephrologists were more prone to initiate a dialysis/graft program than pediatric intensivists. When chronic kidney disease was associated with comorbidities, especially neurological impairment, physicians, regardless of their subspecialty, were more reluctant to initiate conservative treatment. Many of the doctors surveyed did not give their opinion in these prenatal and/or postnatal situations, considered to be unique and warranting a multidisciplinary reflection. CONCLUSION: Such ethical dilemmas are challenging for parents and physicians. They can only be overcome by taking into account both concrete on the ground realities and general principles and values acknowledged to be a basis for respecting the individual. In this way, it ensures humaneness and humanization of a practice that must meet a variety of challenges, one by one. The answer is not simple; it is always unique to each child and can only be approached by a multidisciplinary, time-consuming, open discussion, which will never totally erase uncertainty.

Extremely premature infants: How does death in the delivery room influence mortality rates in two level 3 centers in France?

OBJECTIVES: Mortality rates of very preterm infants may vary considerably between healthcare facilities depending on the neonates' place of inclusion in the cohort study. The objective of this study was to compare the mortality rates of live-born extremely preterm neonates observed in two French tertiary referral hospitals, taking into account the occurrence of neonatal death both in the delivery room and in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including all pregnancy terminations, stillbirths and live-born infants within a 22- to 26-week 0/6 gestational age range was registered by two French level 3 university centers between 2009 and 2013. The mortality rates were compared between the two centers according to two places of inclusion: either the delivery room or the NICU. RESULTS: A total of 344 infants were born at center A and 160 infants were born at center B. Among the live-born neonates, the rates of neonatal death were similar in center A (54/125, 43.2%) and center B (33/69, 47.8%; P=0.54). However, neonatal death occurred significantly more often in the delivery room at center A (31/54, 57.4%) than at center B (6/33, 18.2%; P<0.001). Finally, the neonatal death rate of live-born very preterm neonates admitted to the NICU was significantly lower in center A (25/94, 26.6%) than in center B (27/63, 42.9%; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study points out how the inclusion of deaths in the delivery room when comparing neonatal death rates can lead to a substantial bias in benchmarking studies. Center A and center B each endorsed one of the two models of preferential place of neonatal death (delivery room or NICU) detailed in European studies. The reasons behind the two different models and their impact on how parents perceive supporting their neonate need further investigation.

[Oxytocin administration during spontaneous labour: Guidelines for clinical practice. Guidelines short text]. / Recommandations pour l'administration d'oxytocine au cours du travail spontané. Texte court des recommandations.

OBJECTIVES: To define the different stages of spontaneous labour. To determine the indications, modalities of use and the effects of administering synthetic oxytocin. And to describe undesirable maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with the use of synthetic oxytocin. METHOD: A systematic review was carried out by searching Medline database and websites of obstetrics learned societies until March 2016. RESULTS: The 1st stage of labor is divided in a latence phase and an active phase, which switch at 5cm of cervical dilatation. Rate of cervical dilatation is considered as abnormal below 1cm per 4hour during the first part of the active phase, and below 1cm per 2hours above 7cm of dilatation. During the latent phase of the first stage of labor, i.e. before 5cm of cervical dilatation, it is recommended that an amniotomy not be performed routinely and not to use oxytocin systematically. It is not recommended to expect the active phase of labor to start the epidural analgesia if patient requires it. If early epidural analgesia was performed, the administration of oxytocin must not be systematic. If dystocia during the active phase, an amniotomy is recommended in first-line treatment. In the absence of an improvement within an hour, oxytocin should be administrated. However, in the case of an extension of the second stage beyond 2hours, it is recommended to administer oxytocin to correct a lack of progress of the presentation. If dynamic dystocia, it is recommended to start initial doses of oxytocin at 2mUI/min, to respect at least 30min intervals between increases in oxytocin doses delivered, and to increase oxytocin doses by 2mUI/min intervals without surpassing a maximum IV flow rate of 20mUI/min. The reported maternal adverse effects concern uterine hyperstimulation, uterine rupture and post-partum haemorrhage, and those of neonatal adverse effects concern foetal heart rate anomalies associated with uterine hyperstimulation, neonatal morbidity and mortality, neonatal jaundice, weak suck/poor breastfeeding latch and autism. CONCLUSION: The widespread use of oxytocin during spontaneous labour must not be considered as simply another inoffensive prescription without any possible deleterious consequences for mother or foetus. Conditions for administering the oxytocin must therefore respect medical protocols. Indications and patient consent have to be report in the medical file.

[Variables determining the amount of care for very preterm neonates: the concept of medical stance]. / Diversité inter-régionale de la quantité de soins délivrés aux grands prématurés : notion de « regard médical ¼

OBJECTIVE: To compare the amount of medical interventions on very preterm neonates (24-31 weeks of gestation) in two French university tertiary care centers, one of which is involved in a Neonatal Developmental Care program. A secondary objective is to assess whether this difference in medical interventions can be linked to a difference in mortality and morbidity rates. METHODS: We prospectively included all very preterm neonates free from lethal malformation born live in these two centers between 2006 and 2010. These inclusion criteria were met by 1286 patients, for whom we compared the rate of five selected medical interventions: birth by caesarean section, chest intubation in the delivery room, surfactant therapy, pharmacological treatment of patent ductus arteriosus, and red blood cell transfusion. RESULTS: The rates of the five medical interventions were systematically lower in the center that is involved in Neonatal Developmental Care. There was no significant difference in survival at discharge with no severe cerebral ultrasound scan abnormalities between the two centers. There were, however, significantly higher rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and nosocomial sepsis and longer hospital stays when the patients were not involved in a Neonatal Developmental Care program. DISCUSSION: This benchmarking study shows that in France, in the first decade of the 21st century, there are as many ways to handle very preterm neonates as there are centers in which they are born. This brings to light the concept of medical stance, which is the general care approach prior to the treatment itself. This medical stance creates the overall framework for the staff's decision-making regarding neonate care. The different parameters structuring medical stance are discussed. Moreover, this study raises the problematic issue of the aftermath of benchmarking studies when the conclusion is an increase of morbidity in cases where procedure leads to more interventions.

Comparison of the ability of alternative birthweight and fetal weight standards to identify preterm newborns at increased risk of perinatal death.

OBJECTIVE: To compare prediction of perinatal deaths among preterm infants based on fetal weight standards versus a new subpopulation-based birthweight standard. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: France. POPULATION: A total of 9100 preterm singletons, born between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation in 2000-09, in Burgundy (France). METHODS: We first classified all newborns as either small for gestational age (SGA) or not, based on alternative fetal weight or birthweight standards, including a new birthweight standard that excludes infants born to mothers with disease related to the weight of a fetus. Based on discrepancies between the different classifications, we then divided the newborns into four groups, and compared their risks of stillbirth and in-hospital death, using a generalised linear model with relative risks (RR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal deaths, including, in separate analyses, stillbirths and in-hospital deaths. RESULTS: The preterm infants classified as SGA by our new subpopulation-based birthweight standard but not by the conventional birthweight standard had a significantly higher risk of both stillbirth (RR = 2.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.9-3.6) and in-hospital death (RR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.8-4.5). In contrast, no risk increase was found for infants classified as SGA by the fetal standard only (RR = 1.1; 95% CI = 0.7-1.7 for stillbirths, and RR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3-1.3 for in-hospital deaths). CONCLUSIONS: Our subpopulation-based birthweight standard identified a subgroup of preterm newborns who have significantly increased risks of perinatal death but are not classified as SGA by the conventional birthweight standard. In contrast, the subgroup classified as SGA by the fetal standards only, but not by our subpopulation-based birthweight standard, had no increased risk of mortality, compared with non-SGA infants.

Does plasma IGF-BP3 measurement contribute to the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children?

OBJECTIVE: To audit the contribution of plasma IGF-PB3 measurement to the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children. POPULATION AND METHODS: Retrospective case study including boys and girls aged 0 to 18 years who attended our paediatric endocrinology clinic for short stature and/or post-irradiation follow-up, and had at least one GH provocative testing. Children with hypothyroidism, Laron or Kowarski syndromes, severe malnutrition, chronic renal failure and liver failure were excluded. RESULTS: Fifty-eight children were enrolled and grouped as GHD [+] (19 cases) and GDH [-] (39 cases). IGF-I and IGF-BP3 assay was carried out in 88% and 62% cases respectively, both groups were comparable for age, sex, BMI, target height, pubertal stage and bone age. There was a significant difference in peak GH between GDH [-] and GHD [+] groups (41.8 mUI/L ± 21.7 versus 11.5 ± 5.9 mUI/L, P<0.00001, respectively). No difference was found between groups with regards to IGF-I Z-scores and IGF-BP3 Z-scores. There was, however, a positive correlation between IGF-I Z-scores and IGF-BP3 Z-scores (r=0.50; P<0.0016). IGF-BP3 measurement could not differentiate between GHD [+] and GHD [-] groups. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of plasma IGF-BP3 level contributes poorly to the diagnosis of GHD. We do not recommend it in routine use.

Height at 2 and 5 years of age in children born very preterm: the EPIPAGE study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate growth for children born very preterm with particular focus on those born small-for-gestational age (SGA) or with ex utero growth restraint (GR), and to identify risk factors for short stature at 5 years of age. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based study of children born at less than 33 completed weeks of gestation (Étude Epidémiologique sur les Petits Ages Gestationnels (EPIPAGE)). Short stature was defined as height <-2SD on WHO growth curves. Ex utero GR was considered to have occurred in children with appropriate size for gestational age at birth and with a height and/or weight below -2SD at 2 years of corrected age. Logistic regression models were used to test associations between risk factors and short stature. RESULTS: The authors measured height at 5 years of age for 1,597 of 2,193 children (73%), 5.6% (95% CI 4.6 to 6.9) of whom were diagnosed as having a short stature. Height was measured at 2 and 5 years of age in 1417 children. Among these, 24% of those born SGA and 36% of those with ex utero GR (p=0.002) had a short stature at 5 years. Predictors of short stature were SGA or birth length <-2SD, maternal height ≤ 160 cm, gestational age <29 weeks and systemic corticosteroids. Breastfeeding at discharge decreased the risk of short stature. CONCLUSIONS: Short stature at 5 years of age is common in children born preterm. The highest incidence was observed in the group with ex utero GR. Systemic steroids have a long-term impact on growth and should be used with caution. Breastfeeding at discharge appeared to be protective.

Long-term outcome in children of mothers with gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term outcomes (type 2 diabetes, overweight, cardiovascular disorders, metabolic syndrome and neurological manifestations) from human epidemiological studies of foetuses exposed to gestational diabetes. METHOD: A literature search on Medline was performed for the period from 01 January 1990 to 01 April 2010. Prospective (follow-up of children born to diabetic mothers) and retrospective (investigation of parental history of diabetes in diabetic subjects) studies were analysed. RESULTS: Exposure to gestational diabetes moderately increases the risk of subsequent metabolic complications. It seems that this foetal exposure to maternal blood glucose is only one risk factor of metabolic syndrome among others. In particular, the role of maternal weight in the occurrence of the metabolic syndrome in the offspring is difficult to distinguish from that of gestational diabetes. CONCLUSION: According to the current state of knowledge, it is uncertain whether maternal glycaemia control alone during pregnancy is sufficient for the prevention of metabolic syndrome in the offspring.

[Long term outcome in children of mothers with gestational diabetes]. / Conséquences à long terme d'une exposition fœtale au diabète gestationnel.

OBJECTIVES: To appreciate, in epidemiological studies, the impact of fetal exposure to gestational diabetes on the long term outcome of the offspring (type 2 diabetes, overweight and obesity, metabolic syndrome and neurological complications). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Medline between January 1990 and April 2010. Prospective studies (follow-up of the offspring born of mothers with gestational diabetes) and retrospective studies (questionnaire about the parents'history of diabetes in diabetic patients) were searched and analysed. RESULTS: The fetal exposure to maternal gestational diabetes is a moderate risk factor for metabolic syndrome in the offspring. But some other perinatal risk factors of metabolic syndrome carry a bigger influence. The influence of genetic factors and maternal overweight may not be easily distinguished from the impact of fetal exposure to gestational diabetes. CONCLUSION: It remains uncertain if the control of maternal glycemia alone may be effective and sufficient to prevent the metabolic syndrome in the adult-aged offspring.

[Very preterm birth: is maternal anesthesia a risk factor for neonatal intubation in the delivery room?]. / Le risque d'intubation des grands prématurés en salle de naissance est-il lié au type d'anesthésie maternelle ? Expérience des réseaux périnatals Poitou-Charentes et Franche-Comté

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of tracheal intubation at birth in very premature neonates related to the type of maternal anesthesia in case of elective cesarean. POPULATION AND METHODS: All 219 live-born very premature neonates (28-32 weeks of gestation), delivered after an elective cesarean in the 27 maternity wards of 2 French semi-rural neonatal networks. Eighty-three percent (182/219) were delivered in level III maternity wards in university hospitals. RESULTS: Of the very preterm neonates, 33.3% (73/219) were intubated in the delivery room, either for respiratory distress syndrome or a low APGAR score. Very preterm neonates delivered after maternal general anesthesia were more often intubated than those delivered after spinal anesthesia (48.7% vs 25.2%; OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.8-5.1). The risk of intubation related to maternal general anesthesia remained statistically significant after an adjustment for gestational age, fetal growth retardation, respiratory distress syndrome, type of maternity ward, and a propensity score that took into account maternal sociodemographic characteristics and the causes of very preterm birth (aOR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.4-8.2). The risk of intubation related to general anesthesia was lower after adjusting for the 5-min APGAR score (aOR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.0-7.3). CONCLUSION: Very preterm neonates delivered after cesarean with general anesthesia require tracheal intubation in the delivery room more often than those delivered with spinal anesthesia. This study cannot assess a causal link between anesthesia and the need for neonatal intubation. However, neonatologists have to be aware of the type of maternal anesthesia because it may interfere with the non-invasive ventilation support policy of the very preterm neonate.

Anaesthesia mode for caesarean section and mortality in very preterm infants: an epidemiologic study in the EPIPAGE cohort.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the influence of anaesthesia for caesarean section on outcome in very preterm infants. METHODS: A prospective, population-based, cohort study (the EPIPAGE cohort) included all births before 33 weeks in nine French regions in 1997. Of 2360 infants live-born between 27 and 32 weeks, 1338 were delivered by caesarean section with general anaesthesia (n=711, 53.1%), spinal anaesthesia (n=419, 31.3%), or epidural anaesthesia (n=208, 15.6%). Neonatal mortality was compared among these three groups using bi- (according to gestational age and to anaesthetic technique) and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Neonatal mortality was 10.1% with general anaesthesia, 12.2% with spinal anaesthesia and 7.7% with epidural anaesthesia. After adjustment for gestational age and characteristics of pregnancy, delivery and neonate, spinal anaesthesia was associated with a higher risk of neonatal death than general anaesthesia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.6). CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, spinal anaesthesia was associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality in very preterm infants compared to general anaesthesia (and epidural anaesthesia), independently from gestational age and characteristics of the pregnancies, deliveries and neonates. Although this multivariate analysis does not prove a causal relationship, the results suggest it could exist, particularly if maternal haemodynamics are poorly controlled. With recent significant change in the conduct of spinal anaesthesia, further studies are needed to investigate potential harmful effects of anaesthesia on very preterm infants delivered by caesarean section.

[Very preterm birth: should we be interested in maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index?]. / Grande prématurité : faut-il s'intéresser à la corpulence maternelle ?

UNLABELLED: Link between maternal body mass index (BMI) and pregnancy outcome is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To appreciate the impact of prepregnancy maternal BMI on very preterm birth (22-32 gestation's weeks). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To assess how maternal BMI does explain the mechanism of very preterm birth among live births. METHODS: Population-based study, including each mother with a live or stillborn baby was included in a geographically defined (Poitou-Charentes and Franche-comté, France) case-control study in 2004 to 2006. Leanness (BMI<18.5kg/m(2)) and overweight and obesity (BMI> or =25kg/m(2)) were defined according to World Health Organization's standards. Statistical analysis consisted in a polynomial regression on 832 mothers of very preterm babies and 431 mothers of full-term babies, taking account for confounders as maternal age, birth country, educational level, maternal work and smoking during the pregnancy. RESULTS: Leanness is a risk factor for very preterm live birth (aOR=1.73 [1.12-2.68]), overweight is a risk factor for stillbirth. (aOR=1.71 [1.03-2.84]). Among mothers of live born babies, leanness is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth (aOR=2.12 [1.20-3.74]), whereas overweight is a risk factor for very preterm birth on medical decision due to gestational hypertension (aOR=2.85 [1.80-4.52]). CONCLUSION: Morbid maternal stoutness before pregnancy is a complex risk factor for very preterm delivery. Women and couples should be informed and practitioners should be aware in order to prevent and manage this pathological status.

Impact of the use of antenatal corticosteroids on mortality, cerebral lesions and 5-year neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) on neonatal mortality, cerebral lesions and 5-year neurodevelopmental outcome of infants born at 24-27 and 28-32 weeks of gestational age (GA). DESIGN: Observational population-based study including all births at GAs between 22 and 32 weeks in 1997 in nine regions of France. Survivors were assessed at the age of 5 years. SAMPLE AND METHODS: The population enrolled in the follow up comprised 2323 infants; there were 23 deaths before age 5 years and outcome at 5 years was available for up to 1781 subjects. Two GA subgroups (24-27 and 28-32 weeks of GA) were analysed separately. Propensity scores were used to reduce bias in the estimation of the association between ACS treatment and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal death, neonatal white matter injury, cerebral palsy, mental processing composite (MPC) of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children test and behavioural difficulties at 5 years. RESULTS: In the 28- to 32-week GA subgroup, there was a significant association between ACS and a decreased risk of both neonatal death (OR = 0.61 [0.41-0.91]) and white matter injury (OR = 0.60 [0.46-0.79]) but only a nonsignificant trend for improved 5-year outcome (cerebral palsy, MPC < 70). In the 24- to 27-week GA subgroup, ACS was associated with a significant decrease risk of neonatal death (OR = 0.43 [0.27-0.68]) but there was only a trend for a lower risk of white matter injury and no beneficial impact on outcome at 5 years. Limiting the analysis to only those who received complete courses of ACS did not modify the results. CONCLUSION: The study shows that ACS therapy greatly increases the survival of very preterm infants, including the most immature, but there is little evidence that ACS affects long-term neurodevelopmental and behavioural outcome in 28- to 32-week survivors, and none in <28-week survivors.

[Very preterm birth less than 33 weeks' gestation: how setting-up of a perinatal network does influence the activity of the neonatal tertiary care unit? The experience of the Poitou-Charentes region, France]. / Grande prématurité: impact de la mise en place d'un réseau périnatal sur l'activité du centre de néonatalogie de niveau 3 de la région Poitou-Charentes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of regional perinatal network setting on very preterm neonates (gestational age<33 weeks) referral and activity of regional level 3 NCIU, and short-term outcome of infants cared for. POPULATION AND METHODS: Comparison of data from medical records of hospital days and hospital outcome of very preterm neonates born before and after the setting-up of regional perinatal network (2002-2005). RESULTS: The setting-up of the Poitou-Charentes perinatal network has led to a 45% rise in number of very preterm neonates admitted to the level 3 neonatal care (114 in 2002, 166 in 2005), number of hospitalisation days has also increased by 31% in neonatology unit (2181 days in 2002, 2864 days in 2005) but remained stable in intensive care unit. A transient rise in neonatal mortality was observed, although the incidence of severe ultrasonographic cerebral abnormalities and that of bronchopulmonary dysplasia were lowered. CONCLUSION: Setting-up of perinatal network in Poitou-Charentes (France) has led to improved access to level 3 neonatal care, with rise in very preterm neonates survival and low incidence of short-term sequelae.

[What diagnostic tools can be used to assess antenatal exposure to smoking? Pediatric experience]. / Quels sont les outils diagnostiques chez le nouveau-né de l'exposition anténatale au tabagisme? Expérience pédiatrique.

In France, one out of four infants is born to a smoking mother. The short-, mid-, and long-term effects of antenatal exposure to smoking are only partially known. En Europe, it is generally accepted that most smoking mothers are aware of their smoking habit. Nevertheless, certain mothers deny their smoking or minimize the number of cigarettes smoked. The impact of anti-smoking campaigns on the frequency of maternal smoking and its recognition are unknown. The question is determine whether an objective marker of smoking in the neonatal period would be useful for individual care or epidemiological research. Cotinine and CO are the most widely used neonatalagy.

Does smoking in pregnancy modify the impact of antenatal steroids on neonatal respiratory distress syndrome? Results of the Epipage study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relation between cigarette smoking during pregnancy and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in very preterm birth, and to analyse the differential effect of antenatal steroids on RDS among smokers and non-smokers. DESIGN: A population based cohort study (the French Epipage study). SETTING: Regionally defined births in France. METHODS: A total of 858 very preterm liveborn singletons (27-32 completed weeks of gestation) of the French Epipage study were included in this analysis. The odds ratio for RDS in relation to smoking in pregnancy was estimated using a logistic regression to control for gestational age. The odds ratio for RDS in relation to antenatal steroids was estimated taking into account an interaction between antenatal steroids and cigarette smoking, using multiple logistic regression to control for gestational age, birthweight ratio, main causes of preterm birth, mode of delivery, and sex. RESULTS: The odds ratio for RDS in relation to smoking in pregnancy adjusted for gestational age (aOR) was 0.59 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.79). The aOR for RDS in relation to antenatal steroids was 0.31 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.49) in babies born to non-smokers and 0.63 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.05) in those born to smokers; the difference was significant (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking during pregnancy is associated with a decrease in the risk of RDS in very preterm babies. Although antenatal steroids reduce the risk of RDS in babies born to both smokers and non-smokers, the reduction is smaller in those born to smokers.

Re-hospitalization in infants younger than 29 weeks' gestation in the EPIPAGE cohort.

AIM: To estimate the re-hospitalization rate of extremely preterm children during infancy and associated factors after the recent improvement in survival rates. METHOD: The cohort included all children born before 29 wk of gestation in nine French regions in 1997. All admissions between discharge from initial hospitalization and 9 mo after birth were considered. Factors studied included the child's characteristics at birth and during neonatal hospitalization, risk factors for infection after discharge and parents' socio-demographic characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for re-hospitalization for all reasons and for respiratory disorders were obtained from logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 376 children, 178 were re-admitted at least once (47.3%; 95% CI: 42.3-52.4). Fifty-five percent of the hospitalized children were admitted at least once for respiratory disorders. The re-hospitalization rate was higher for children who had had chronic lung disease (aOR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3-3.7), those initially discharged between August and October (aOR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.2-5.1) or between November and January (aOR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5-6.8), and children living with other children under six (aOR: 3.4; 95 %CI: 1.6-7.5). Re-hospitalizations were associated with neither gestational age nor the duration of neonatal hospitalization. Adjusted odds ratios for re-hospitalization for respiratory tract disorders were very similar to those for the overall hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Infants born before 29 wk have a very high risk of re-hospitalization. The associated factors can help define high-risk groups at discharge from the neonatal unit who need special surveillance.

Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome for all infants born before 33 weeks gestation until discharge from hospital. DESIGN: A prospective observational population based study. SETTING: Nine regions of France in 1997. PATIENTS: All births or late terminations of pregnancy for fetal or maternal reasons between 22 and 32 weeks gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Life status: stillbirth, live birth, death in delivery room, death in intensive care, decision to limit intensive care, survival to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 722 late terminations, 772 stillbirths, and 2901 live births were recorded. The incidence of very preterm births was 1.3 per 100 live births and stillbirths. The survival rate for births between 22 and 32 weeks was 67% of all births (including stillbirths), 85% of live births, and 89% of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. Survival increased with gestational age: 31% of all infants born alive at 24 weeks survived to discharge, 78% at 28 weeks, and 97% at 32 weeks. Survival among live births was lower for small for gestational age infants, multiple births, and boys. Overall, 50% of deaths after birth followed decisions to withhold or withdraw intensive care: 66% of deaths in the delivery room, decreasing with increasing gestational age; 44% of deaths in the neonatal intensive care unit, with little variation with gestational age. CONCLUSION: Among very preterm babies, chances of survival varies greatly according to the length of gestation. At all gestational ages, a large proportion of deaths are associated with a decision to limit intensive care.